Dementia and end-of-life decisions : the Hastings Center is going to examine the question
Published on : 19/06/2019
Author / Source : The Hastings Center, National Institute in Aging
The senior population in the United States is growing, and as such, so is the number of cases of dementia. When a person has dementia, they experience the progressive impairment of cognitive facilities, including memory, problem solving and language. There is no cure yet for dementia and there is no effective way to halt its progression. As the condition progresses, the affected person requires daily assistance and eventually total care. Because dementia causes a loss of many cognitive capabilities, loss of ability to make decisions has caused discussion surrounding end-of-life and dementia. The Hastings Center, based in Garrison, New York, is going to conduct research into end-of-life practices for patients with dementia.
In the United States, a person has the right to refuse treatment. In most cases, this person must be able to make this decision on their own. People who have received a diagnosis of a degenerative disease, such as dementia, and who will lose their decision-making capacity, have the same right to refuse treatment through an advance directive or a surrogate decision maker. Many believe that this provides a lack of full reflection for patients with dementia because of the complexity of the disease. At different stages of the disease, it is difficult to determine the patient's level of competency in making their own decisions, and the possibility of a differing attitude is possible. Therefore, the established criteria for refusal of treatment decisions do not fully address the cases of many persons facing dementia.
Because there is a lack of full reflection on dementia cases, the Hastings Center will conduct research into the ethics of end-of-life choices in the context of dementia. The purpose of this research is to identify areas where additional research or policymaking is necessary. The report will be published in 2021.
A similar observation made Prof.dr. Robbert Huijsman bring together in a freely available book the academic and bibliographic profiles of all Dutch professors specializing in the study of dementia. With this book, he hopes to allow the experts to share their work so they could "give a direction to the understanding of the beginning and the progress of the disease, and possible solutions for the care of the dementia patients". At a time when voices are being heard in Belgium and Canada to allow the euthanasia of demented people, such research is very important and deserves to be relayed broadly.
Death by Request in Switzerland: Post-traumatic stress disorder and complicated grief after witnessing assisted suicide
- Mental HealthA study conducted in Switzerland in December 2007 among 85 family members and friends who were present at an assisted suicide showed higher prevalence of PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder) and complicated grief after witnessing assisted suicide than following a natural death. Switzerland is one of the few nations in which assisted suicide is legal. It is generally defined as the prescribing or supplying of drugs with the explicit intention of enabling the patient to end his or her own...
- AbortionIn plenary session in Brussels on Thursday June 24, the European Parliament adopted (378 votes in favor; 255 against; 42 abstentions) the resolution and report "On the situation of sexual and reproductive health and rights in the EU, in the frame of women's health".
Proposed by Croatian MEP Predrag Fred Matić, this controversial resolution considers in particular the issue of abortion in unqualified terms, demanding "safe and legal access to abortion based on women's health and rights", whil...
BREAKING NEWS - The Belgian Constitutional Court rejects the appeal relating to the 2020 law on euthanasia
- Euthanasia and assisted suicideIn a judgment published on Thursday February 17, 2022, the Constitutional Court of Belgium rejects the action for annulment of the law of 15 March 2020 amending the legislation on euthanasia.
Of the three amendments introduced by the law, the Court considers that two of them are not contrary to the Constitution. As regards the third provision, relating to the infringement of the freedom of healthcare institutions which do not practise euthanasia, the Court refuses to examine the ...