“Thou shalt not die in pain”: Treatment decisions at the end of life

 Print

Thematic : End of life / Palliative care

Studies

Published on : 01/03/2002

Author / Source : Margaret Somerville

Professor in the Faculty of Medicine
Founding Director of the Faculty of Law's Centre for Medicine,
Ethics and Law at McGill University

A recent paper, Consensus Guidelines on Analgesia and Sedation in Dying Intensive Care Unit Patients (L.A Hawryluck, W.R.C. Harvey, L. Lemieux-Charles and P.A. Singer, University of Toronto, March 2002) attracted a great deal of media attention.  In the process, some confusion about the ethics and law of treating the pain and suffering of dying people, in particular, those in intensive care units, was revealed.  So, what are the current bottom-line ethical and legal rules?

Patient-centred decisionmaking…

First, decision making about treatment must be patient-centred — in the past, it was physician-centred.  Requiring the patient's — or the incompetent patient's representative's — informed consent to giving, withholding or withdrawing treatment, ensures patient-centredness. 

At a certain point, terminally ill patients — or their representatives — will decide not to continue treatment that has a goal of prolonging life, and to change to palliative treatment that has a primary goal of treating pain and suffering.  Note: this is a decision to change the nature of the treatment received and not a decision to cease treatment or an informed refusal of treatment.  In the past, it was not uncommon for physicians to say to dying patients, “There is nothing more we can do for you”. That statement would, now, encapsulate the antithesis of good, contemporary palliative medicine. 

 

“'Thou shalt not die in pain' Treatment decisions at the end of life”, Canadian Disability, Winter 2002, 9-11.

  • euthanasia
  • palliative care

Similar articles

Legalizing euthanasia. Why now?

- Euthanasia and assisted suicide

Professor in the Faculty of Medicine
Founding Director of the Faculty of Law's Centre for Medicine,
Ethics and Law at McGill University

Until very recently, all countries prohibited euthanasia....

 

Somerville, Margaret, Death Talk: The Case against Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide, McGill Queen's University Press; Montreal, 2001, pp 433.  Chapter 6 reprinted in Wesley Cragg, Christine M. Koggel, Contemporary Moral Issues, 5th Ed., 2005.

Read more

Euthanasia Policy and practice in Belgium

Euthanasia Policy and practice in Belgium

- Euthanasia and assisted suicide

Critical Observations and Suggestions for Improvement  

 

ABSTRACT: The essay opens with some background information about the context of euthanasia in Belgium. It proceeds by discussing the Belgian law on euthanasia and concerns about the law, its interpretations and implementation. Finally, the major developments and controversies since the law came into effect are discussed. Suggestions as to how to improve the Belgian law and circumscribe the practice of euthanasia are made, urging Be...

Read more

Belgian Euthanasia Increases by 89% in four years.

- Euthanasia and assisted suicide

Belgian Euthanasia Increases by 89% in four years.

The Act of 28 May 2002 concerning euthanasia stipulates that the Federal Committee on Oversight and Enforcement, shall biennially report to the legislature. Here is the sixth report, covering the years 2012-2013.

The report comprises firstly a statistical element, which we note here that the number of reported euthanasia has almost doubled in four years (an increase of 89%), from 953 reported in 2010 to 1,807 in 2013 euthanasia. The ...

Read more